Are Chiropractors Quacks? (an honest reflection by a chiropractor)
By Andy Park DC,
Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS) Specialist.
Are Chiropractors Quacks? (an honest reflection by a chiropractor)
The question of whether chiropractors are quacks is a polarizing one, with passionate arguments on both sides. To understand the complexity of this issue, it's essential to explore the history, principles, scientific evidence, and criticisms of chiropractic care.
History and Principles of Chiropractic Care
Chiropractic care was founded in 1895 by Daniel David Palmer, who claimed to have restored a janitor's hearing by adjusting his spine. Palmer's theory was based on the concept of vertebral subluxation, which posits that misaligned spinal vertebrae interfere with the body's nervous system, leading to various health issues. Chiropractors historically aimed to correct these misalignments through spinal manipulations, also known as adjustments. As an aside the subluxation theory is one that we at Northcenter Healthcare do not subscribe to and take a much more nuanced, evidence based, and scientific approach to care.
Scientific Evidence and Effectiveness
The effectiveness of chiropractic care varies depending on the condition being treated. There is a substantial body of evidence supporting the use of chiropractic care for certain conditions, particularly:
1. Low Back Pain: Numerous studies and systematic reviews have shown that chiropractic care, specifically spinal manipulation, can be effective for acute and chronic low back pain. Guidelines from several health organizations, including the American College of Physicians, recommend spinal manipulation as a treatment option for low back pain.
2. Neck Pain: Some evidence suggests that chiropractic adjustments can be beneficial for neck pain, though the results are less consistent than those for low back pain. A systematic review published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews found moderate evidence supporting spinal manipulation for neck pain.
3. Headaches: Chiropractic care, particularly spinal manipulation, has shown some effectiveness in treating tension headaches and migraines. A review in the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics reported that spinal manipulation could help reduce the frequency and intensity of headaches.
However, the evidence for chiropractic care in treating other conditions, such as asthma, hypertension, and menstrual pain, is less convincing. Critics argue that chiropractors often overstate the benefits of spinal manipulation for these conditions, which lack robust scientific backing, however these are claims that you will not see us touting at our office. On occasion we might mention an instance of an adjustment helping some of these conditions anecdotally but never position ourselves and being an authority on treating those conditions by any means.
Criticisms and Controversies within the Chiropractic Field
Several criticisms and controversies surround chiropractic care, contributing to the perception of chiropractors as being questionable in their dependability as healthcare providers:
1. There can be a lack of standardization in chiropractic education. Practices may also vary significantly across different countries and even within regions. This lack of standardization can lead to inconsistent quality of care.
2. For those that DO put the subluxation theory front and center in their practice (which we do not) the vertebral subluxation theory, lacks scientific evidence. Modern medical science does not recognize subluxations as a cause of disease, leading many to view this theory as pseudoscientific.
3. As with any type of therapy there are always some safety considerations. Generally considered safe, spinal manipulation is not without risks. There have historically been concerns of serious complications, such as vertebral artery dissection leading to stroke, particularly with neck manipulations. Those kinds of incidents however, have been shown to largely be coincidental and not causal lacking substantial evidence to link those events with any type of intervention.
4. For those chiropractors that may still practice with an “old school” mindset. We find that there is often a lack of Integration with mainstream medicine in those types of providers. Chiropractic care is sometimes seen as being at odds with mainstream medicine. This lack of integration can create barriers to coordinated care and contribute to the perception of chiropractors as alternative or fringe practitioners. With that said we are always happy to reach out to your primary care doctor or refer you out to the appropriate type of health care provider when necessary.
The Role of Evidence-Based Practice
To address these criticisms, there has been a growing movement within the chiropractic community toward evidence-based practice. Evidence-based chiropractors focus on treatments supported by scientific research and work collaboratively with other healthcare professionals. This approach aims to provide high-quality, patient-centered care and to align chiropractic practice with mainstream medical standards.
Regulation and Professionalism
Regulation and professional standards play a crucial role in ensuring the quality and safety of chiropractic care. In many countries, chiropractors are required to complete extensive education and training, including undergraduate studies, chiropractic college, and clinical internships. Additionally, professional organizations, such as the American Chiropractic Association (ACA) and the World Federation of Chiropractic (WFC), work to promote best practices and ethical standards within the profession.
Patient Perspectives
Patient satisfaction with chiropractic care is generally high, particularly among those seeking treatment for musculoskeletal conditions. Many patients report relief from pain and improved quality of life following chiropractic treatment. This positive patient feedback highlights the value of chiropractic care for certain individuals, despite the ongoing controversies and criticisms.
Summary
The question of whether chiropractors are quacks does not have a simple yes or no answer. While there are legitimate criticisms and areas of concern within the chiropractic profession, there is also substantial evidence supporting the effectiveness of chiropractic care for specific conditions, particularly low back pain, neck pain, and headaches.
The perception of chiropractors as quacks is often fueled by historical controversies, the persistence of pseudoscientific theories like subluxation, and the actions of a minority within the profession who engage in questionable practices. However, the movement toward evidence-based practice and greater integration with mainstream medicine is helping to improve the credibility and legitimacy of chiropractic care.
Ultimately, the value of chiropractic care should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific condition being treated, the qualifications and approach of the individual chiropractor, and the patient's own experiences and outcomes. By fostering a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of chiropractic care, we can better appreciate its potential benefits and limitations within the broader healthcare landscape.
We hope you found this article to be enlightening! If you’re an athlete or an active individual who is also experiencing an injury or want to improve your performance, then don’t wait any longer. Give us a call (773-296-2766) or text us at (773-692-0670) to book your FREE Discovery call or Movement Assessment today!
Do this next!
Share this Article with a Friend or Family member who has been dealing with a sports injury, pregnancy related pain or dysfunction, or any other type of physical issue (i.e. hip or knee pain, low back pain, shoulder pain etc.) We can help!
Call our office TODAY at (773) 296-2766 to book your New Patient appointment or schedule a free chat (discovery call) with us to see if we can help you out or if you have other questions about care or costs. You can book either by clicking here!
Keep an eye out for out next article!